Moderator mervin Posted September 18, 2012 Moderator Posted September 18, 2012 Kate Middleton is an anagram of Naked tit model
sniff6 Posted September 18, 2012 Posted September 18, 2012 Kate Middleton is an anagram of Naked tit model RIGHT off to the Tower with him!!!!
Moderator mervin Posted September 18, 2012 Author Moderator Posted September 18, 2012 RIGHT off to the Tower with him!!!! OK so long as Kate is locked in with me !!!!
Moderator drewpy Posted September 18, 2012 Moderator Posted September 18, 2012 has anyone seen the pictures? what a load of crap!
wild foamy Posted September 18, 2012 Posted September 18, 2012 tbh, i think its a bit naughty that the photos were taken whilst they were in a secluded private residence, fucks sake i walk around my room naked so why can't the royalty? its like all that bollocks with the vegas hotel, if i had loads of money and a vegas hotel too right i would have lots of pretty women walking around scantily clad. Wills is a fresh breath of air into the otherwise stale and outdated monarchy, he is someone we can all relate to, and Kate is gorgeous, 'nuff said. didn't see Wills working at the olympics though, funny old thing that, its classed as an 'op' when they want it to be, sure they can make us work 18 hours a day for 2 months with only 6 days off during the whole time, but as soon as i want my 7 days off as operational standown they shit-can it, no planning or organisation whatsoever, many days i turned up at the olympic park at 5 in the fucking morning only to be told it was working nights or having a days standown but seeing as i was there i may aswell be put to work... rant over, 'nuff said...
up.yours Posted September 19, 2012 Posted September 19, 2012 they are in the public eye, they should expect this sort of thing. they chose their lifestyle,
Moderator drewpy Posted September 19, 2012 Moderator Posted September 19, 2012 they are in the public eye, they should expect this sort of thing. they chose their lifestyle, no they didn't ,we did
paulrever Posted September 19, 2012 Posted September 19, 2012 It should be a simple rule, if they pose.. shoot, if no pose.... don't shoot. Hard to obey rules yes, but if pics are taken and it's not 'a pose', sue the ass of 'em!
up.yours Posted September 19, 2012 Posted September 19, 2012 one minute they want all the attention, the next minute they don't.
neversaydie Posted September 20, 2012 Posted September 20, 2012 Storm in a c cup Who buys these mags anyway? Is it the frog equivalent of Hello/OK? They're full of absolute shite, photos and "gossip" of over inflated egos/wanabees, "soap stars" who cant act for toffee, aimed at a generation of dullards
DkD Posted September 20, 2012 Posted September 20, 2012 I bet If it where Camilla topless there would'nt be so much fuss!!
Matthew Duncan Posted September 21, 2012 Posted September 21, 2012 : I bet If it where Camilla topless there would'nt be so much fuss!! HAHA! i didnt see why they made so much of a fuss about it tbh - saying that - at this rate it wont be long till the royals have a calender out . . .
wild foamy Posted September 21, 2012 Posted September 21, 2012 what do you expect? neversaydie kinda hit the nail on the head, filth sells faster than news, those "magazines" are full of shit, targeted at a generation of apathetic dispunded trust-fund babies
Recommended Posts