January 28, 201015 yr Moderator Aah but if you're always unreliable then then you can be relied upon to be so, therefore you can now be categorised as being reliable and so cannot sue for being unreliable. On the otherhand if youre not always unrelable you must be reliable some of the time therefore you cannot class yourself as unreliable, so i'm afraid like before...you cannot sue
January 28, 201015 yr Moderator Paul have you inhaled some weird chemical at work today ???? Sorry Merv, i've just been writing Tony blairs defence speech for tomorrow.
January 29, 201015 yr Aah but if you're always unreliable then then you can be relied upon to be so, therefore you can now be categorised as being reliable and so cannot sue for being unreliable. On the otherhand if youre not always unrelable you must be reliable some of the time therefore you cannot class yourself as unreliable, so i'm afraid like before...you cannot sue If you are always unreliable, then you are unreliable in all ways and therefore cannot even be relied upon to be unreliable. You still cannot sue.
_33963e.png)
_83bc35.png)
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.