I don't care.
They test on animals. It's done in a legal fashion now, but CR UK and GlaxoSmithKline were two of the biggest illegal testers going. Either way, they're off my love list.
TBH, I find if you dig deep enough, most charities have huge admin costs that drain the cash away and leave precious little. Amnesty lost my vote when they tried to prevent the death penalty for a serial rapist and murderer in an arabic land where the punishment was pretty standard for the crime. 'Human Rights' really don't mean much in that kind of case.
Oxfam too have been called on how 60p of every pound is used to cover their admin costs.
True.
But a great deal of it is down to our chosen lifestyles.
If anyone who drives a vehicle complains about my smoking, they get blasted with the full force of my millitant wit - I find it very hypocritical when someone hassles me for smoking, yet spend their time blasting about in/on a machine that spews out carcinogenic chemicals that poison everybody who lives near a road.
Sad as it may be for those who have lost, some of it is just misfortune and Nature doing it's indiscriminate thing.
Some of it is people being stupid - Like my cousin who suffered an embolism due to smoking.
Person on a film/TV set who carries stuff, moves it about between locations etc.
In short, the person who carried the cameras up the mountain (not the camera operator) as well as any other stuff like tables, chairs, tents and all that gubbins.