My friend and I are in different camps about which is best, any views?

It's really down to the individual, some say the "original" LC because it was the first, others say the PV cause it a "turning point".

I like both, but Iv'e never owned the PV,Iv'e ridden a couple, like I say it's really your own choice.

depends what you like really. sure, specs/test say the powervalve is better, but i think they lost the character the first lc's had, and no longer had such a pronounced powerband. best is the powervalve for speed/handling/brakes. but for most character, rawness and looks go to the lc.

best is the powervalve for speed/handling/brakes. but for most character, rawness and looks go to the lc.

But if you want to ride a REAL motorbike.......AC RD's are the way to go :tu 8)

very true 8) the ac's are awsome, less refined, proper stroker, proper powerband

The powervalve is the better bike technically, more powerful, more reliable motor, better chassis and suspension etc. The original LC has loads more character though and is much better looking (IMO). The TZR's were better still with lighter wheels, ally frames and better suspension and brakes. The simple answer must be a YPVS engine in an early LC chassis with TZR wheels and forks. Here's mine :wink:

that really is a stunning bike rich, it's a credit to you